What’s in it for me?

Despite the fact that Saunders highlights the positive benefits femtocells have for mobile operators, it is important to also look at the repercussions for broadband service providers, as they are going to have to cope with a huge amount of extra traffic being driven through their networks, seemingly without reaping any financial gain. Unless changes are made, wholesale broadband providers, such as BT, won’t see additional revenue for carrying this additional traffic – mobile phone operators will be the sole beneficiary.

Mobile phone operators are essentially piggy-backing on wholesale broadband providers’ existing infrastructure in order to offer this new femtocell service. Mobile phone traffic is being carried by the broadband providers’ network from the subscribers’ home. This way, mobile operators avoid the cost of carrying the femtocell subscribers’ data on its own radio network to its core network because the traffic is carried on the existing wholesale broadband service providers’ network.

More business for mobile operators

As a result, if more mobile subscribers access services via femtocells, the existing mobile backhaul network will become less congested, in turn allowing mobile operators to serve new customers without investing in extra backhaul capacity.

Therefore, wholesale broadband providers will be expected to handle the increased traffic generated for no extra revenue, while mobile phone companies will significantly increase their margins.

In the long term, broadband service providers will gradually see increased traffic and even congestion in their networks and may have to invest in extra capacity. Even if the mobile operators had to pay additional charges, it could still be worth their while compared to upgrading their own core networks.

Taking advantage

Technically speaking, because the broadband service provider transports the mobile operator’s traffic to its core network it therefore enables the possibility to bill the mobile operators for its services, although this is not as straight forward as it sounds.

BT is petitioning to lower mobile termination rates (MTR) to reduce the cost for its customers. MTR is applied when someone makes a call to a different mobile network, or calls a mobile from their landline, because the mobile phone operator charges a fee for carrying the call, a cost which is passed onto the consumer. So can a broadband provider, such as BT, realistically impose a similar billing system onto mobile phone users who use their broadband service via a femtocell?

Thinking inside the femtocell box

Broadband providers may have to think outside the box to generate their share of the revenue. They have the option of bringing advertising into the equation as a source of revenue because femtocells resemble a small broadband router and create a point of presence in consumers’ homes.

Manufacturers of the device could implement an LCD screen with the view to play out relevant advertisements. This could generate a significant amount of revenue by advertising products and services that are relevant to the owners of the handsets. This is achieved by building a profile of the people connecting to each femtocell. For example, do they make a lot of international phone calls or do they download a lot of music?

By collating this usage information, broadband providers can analyse how consumers are utilising their femtocells. This knowledge creates opportunities for them to commercially exploit the demand for femtocells, which could actually result in substantially higher margins than those achieved by the mobile phone operators.

SAS is a business analytics software and services company. It provides a technology platform and analytic applications to help users not only navigate today’s challenges, but capitalise on tomorrow’s opportunities. http://www.sas.com/